The best way to improve the quality of the education in a country is to increase teacher's salaries.
Education is always considered to be the key of national development. The level of education always indicates the strength of science and technologies. There are many ways to improve the quality of education such as establish universities, increase teachers' salaries. But take increment of teachers' salaries as the best way to elevate education quality is a statement I can hardly agree with.
When we talk about education, teachers are always the first group of people appears in our brains. It is inevitable that teachers play an irreplaceable roll in education. Increasing teachers' salary is a good way to stimulate people's enthusiasm in becoming teachers. Accordingly, cleverest people of the country are all willing to compete for this honorable and profitable job and the quality of teachers are improved eventually. That seems to be advisable. However, this policy may direct education to the opposite way of our original intention.
Though attracted more excellent people to the education career, teachers' profitable life also results in higher cost of education. One of the negative effects of higher expend on education is the higher burden on students and their families. Actually, it is already a well acknowledged phenomenon that in most countries high education is no longer affordable to every family. More and more students have debts to pay now before they graduate, some of them even have to drop out. Further more, higher cost of education may results in smaller number of teachers. That is because most of the educational facilities are supported by the government. These public schools form the base of a country's education. Meanwhile, the budget on educations of every country is always arranged according to the economical status of the nation. Most of the time, this budget is limited. With the limited money, public schools have to reduce the number of teachers to maintain their existence. The reduction of teachers will dramatically exacerbate the education situation.
Regardless of the negative effects of increasing teachers' salaries, there are many better ways to improve the national education quality. For example, building more public libraries is an applicable choice. Since the importance of knowledge is already accepted by every citizen of a civilized country, one of the factor constrains people's self-learning process is the insufficiency of public learning resource. Libraries are offers most acceptable learning resource. Constructing new libraries absolutely meets the needs on education facilities of entire society. Moreover, the establishing of libraries also impels development of an important part of education, the publishing industry, behind which stands the main body of education -- educated crowds.
The development of education needs the participation of every group of overall nation. Among all the choices of stimulating strategies, improving the benefits of teachers is definitely not the best option. Instead of put too much resource on specified group, we should pay more attention on public education facilities such as libraries. The best way to improve the quality of the education in a country is to increase teacher's salaries.
Education is always considered to be the key of national development. The level of education always indicates the strength of science and technologies. There are many ways to improve the quality of education such as establish universities, increase teachers' salaries. But take increment of teachers' salaries as the best way to elevate education quality is a statement I can hardly agree with.
When we talk about education, teachers are always the first group of people appears in our brains. It is inevitable that teachers play an irreplaceable roll in education. Increasing teachers' salary is a good way to stimulate people's enthusiasm in becoming teachers. Accordingly, cleverest people of the country are all willing to compete for this honorable and profitable job and the quality of teachers are improved eventually. That seems to be advisable. However, this policy may direct education to the opposite way of our original intention.
Though attracted more excellent people to the education career, teachers' profitable life also results in higher cost of education. One of the negative effects of higher expend on education is the higher burden on students and their families. Actually, it is already a well acknowledged phenomenon that in most countries high education is no longer affordable to every family. More and more students have debts to pay now before they graduate, some of them even have to drop out. Further more, higher cost of education may results in smaller number of teachers. That is because most of the educational facilities are supported by the government. These public schools form the base of a country's education. Meanwhile, the budget on educations of every country is always arranged according to the economical status of the nation. Most of the time, this budget is limited. With the limited money, public schools have to reduce the number of teachers to maintain their existence. The reduction of teachers will dramatically exacerbate the education situation.
Regardless of the negative effects of increasing teachers' salaries, there are many better ways to improve the national education quality. For example, building more public libraries is an applicable choice. Since the importance of knowledge is already accepted by every citizen of a civilized country, one of the factor constrains people's self-learning process is the insufficiency of public learning resource. Libraries are offers most acceptable learning resource. Constructing new libraries absolutely meets the needs on education facilities of entire society. Moreover, the establishing of libraries also impels development of an important part of education, the publishing industry, behind which stands the main body of education -- educated crowds.
The development of education needs the participation of every group of overall nation. Among all the choices of stimulating strategies, improving the benefits of teachers is definitely not the best option. Instead of put too much resource on specified group, we should pay more attention on public education facilities such as libraries.