Parents are the first teachers of the children
Circulating on the Internet a small story, a 7,8 year old child, on the side of the road to passerby throwing pebbles, child next to parents let children such nonsense. There is a small youth can not be read to children, a child, and later the parents, both sides fought ... ... Story about that, after hearing this story, I feel very complicated.
Say normally, children 7,8 years old at the naughty, naughty child is not bad, but the child's naughty hurt others, that is a child. Child no correct judgment, parents should timely child education, guides the child to correct mistakes, do the right thing. Then the child's parents on the child's side, see the child to passers-by throwing stones, even as the longitudinal. It is wrong of parents. Parents is the child's first teacher, if the parents may spoil their children, so children will lose the correct sense of right or wrong judgment, to identify unknown of what was the social morality, for a long time, the children will be doing very extreme, ranging from to, while will move toward crime edge. In fact, he did not alarmist, children can't distinguish right from wrong, do parents don't know what's right? As the story 's parents, is indulging their children in crime.
This young child playing Halo, the child's parents did not work, so the child 's brother and father are also involved. Sadly, the children's parents did not properly, correctly handle the matter, but the violence. Complete disregard of the law at disregarding. The children were playing, parents and youth work, to have children beaten back. What kind of logic is this, today you to fight each other, each other again tomorrow will hit you hit, when will the retribution. But this act of revenge is a kind of fault, if the two sides hurt anyone, should be subject to legal action. Parents act of revenge, virtually affect children of things is a judgment, the child will think he is playing, parents have to revenge for yourself. Children with this idea once formed, then later encountered this kind of thing, will be to the hours of judgment as a benchmark, to violence with violence, until by the legal liability. I'm afraid at that time, the most regret is the child's parents.
To sum up, I always think, parents are the first teachers of the children, the children grew up, completely affected by their parents. The parents of every word and action, will affect the child, children imitating, children will learn the parents and action. As parents, must give the child to create a good environment for the growth, must be strict self-discipline, give their children make good example. Teach children to correctly judge things, guide the children grow healthily. Now every family generally have a child, the child 's childhood education is every parent 's responsibility, after all parents are the first teachers of the children. For the healthy growth of children, as parents in one, hope all parents can set up the correct words and deeds, for children to make them proud.
译文——————————————————————————————————————
父母是孩子的第一任老师
网上流传着一个小故事,说一个7、8岁大的小孩子,在路边向路人扔小石子,孩子旁边的父母却任由孩子这样地胡闹.有一个小青年看不下去,对着小孩子就是一脚,后来小孩子的父母来了,双方打了起来……故事的经过大意就是这样,当听完这则故事时,我的心情很复杂.
　　按理说,小孩子7、8岁正值最淘气的时候,小孩子淘气不是坏事,但是小孩子的淘气伤害到别人的时候,那就是小孩子不对了.小孩子对事情没有正确地判断能力时,父母就要及时地教育孩子,引导孩子改正错误,做正确的事情.可当时孩子的父母就在孩子的身边,见小孩子对路人扔石子,竟然任之纵之.这就是父母的不对了.父母可是孩子的第一任老师,如果父母过会溺爱孩子,那么孩子就会失去正确的是非观念判断,辨别不明什么是社会的道德,时间一长,孩子做事就会很极端,轻则自已为是,重则就会走向犯罪的边缘.其实自己并没有危言耸听,孩子不会辩明是非,难道父母还不知道对与错?像这则故事中的父母,就是在纵容自己孩子在犯罪.
　　这个小青年踢晕小孩子后,孩子的父母不干了,于是孩子的兄长及父亲也参与进来.令人惋惜的是,孩子的父母并没有妥善地、正确地处理事情,而是以暴制暴.完全漠视法律于不顾.小孩子被打,父母去和小青年动手,非得把孩子的挨打找回来.这是什么逻辑,今天你把对方打了,明天对方也会打人再你你打一顿,冤冤相报何时了.而且这种报复的行为本就是一种错,如果双方伤了谁,都要受到法律上的追究.父母的报复行为,无形中又会影响小孩子对事情是非的判断,小孩子会认为自己被打,父母就要为自己报仇.孩子的这种观念一旦形成,那么以后遇到这种事情,就会以小时的判断为基准,以暴制暴,直至受到法律责任的追究.我想恐怕到时候,最后悔的莫过于孩子的父母吧.
　　综上所述,我始终认为,父母是孩子的第一任老师,孩子的儿时成长,完全受到父母的影响.父母的一言一行,都会影响到孩子,孩子善于模仿,孩子会学父母的言行和动作.作为父母,一定要给孩子创造良好的成长环境,一定要严格律己,给自己的孩子做出好的榜样.教会孩子正确地判断事物,引导孩子健康地成长.现在每个家庭一般都一个孩子,孩子的儿时教育是每一个父母应尽的责任,毕竟父母是孩子的第一任老师.为了孩子们的健康成长,作为父母中的一员,希望所有父母们都能树立正确的言行,给孩子作出他们为之骄傲的榜样.
by：0o扇o0 Parents are the first teachers of the children
Circulating on the Internet a small story, a 7,8 year old child, on the side of the road to passerby throwing pebbles, child next to parents let children such nonsense. There is a small youth can not be read to children, a child, and later the parents, both sides fought ... ... Story about that, after hearing this story, I feel very complicated.
Say normally, children 7,8 years old at the naughty, naughty child is not bad, but the child's naughty hurt others, that is a child. Child no correct judgment, parents should timely child education, guides the child to correct mistakes, do the right thing. Then the child's parents on the child's side, see the child to passers-by throwing stones, even as the longitudinal. It is wrong of parents. Parents is the child's first teacher, if the parents may spoil their children, so children will lose the correct sense of right or wrong judgment, to identify unknown of what was the social morality, for a long time, the children will be doing very extreme, ranging from to, while will move toward crime edge. In fact, he did not alarmist, children can't distinguish right from wrong, do parents don't know what's right? As the story 's parents, is indulging their children in crime.
This young child playing Halo, the child's parents did not work, so the child 's brother and father are also involved. Sadly, the children's parents did not properly, correctly handle the matter, but the violence. Complete disregard of the law at disregarding. The children were playing, parents and youth work, to have children beaten back. What kind of logic is this, today you to fight each other, each other again tomorrow will hit you hit, when will the retribution. But this act of revenge is a kind of fault, if the two sides hurt anyone, should be subject to legal action. Parents act of revenge, virtually affect children of things is a judgment, the child will think he is playing, parents have to revenge for yourself. Children with this idea once formed, then later encountered this kind of thing, will be to the hours of judgment as a benchmark, to violence with violence, until by the legal liability. I'm afraid at that time, the most regret is the child's parents.
To sum up, I always think, parents are the first teachers of the children, the children grew up, completely affected by their parents. The parents of every word and action, will affect the child, children imitating, children will learn the parents and action. As parents, must give the child to create a good environment for the growth, must be strict self-discipline, give their children make good example. Teach children to correctly judge things, guide the children grow healthily. Now every family generally have a child, the child 's childhood education is every parent 's responsibility, after all parents are the first teachers of the children. For the healthy growth of children, as parents in one, hope all parents can set up the correct words and deeds, for children to make them proud.
译文——————————————————————————————————————
父母是孩子的第一任老师
网上流传着一个小故事,说一个7、8岁大的小孩子,在路边向路人扔小石子,孩子旁边的父母却任由孩子这样地胡闹.有一个小青年看不下去,对着小孩子就是一脚,后来小孩子的父母来了,双方打了起来……故事的经过大意就是这样,当听完这则故事时,我的心情很复杂.
　　按理说,小孩子7、8岁正值最淘气的时候,小孩子淘气不是坏事,但是小孩子的淘气伤害到别人的时候,那就是小孩子不对了.小孩子对事情没有正确地判断能力时,父母就要及时地教育孩子,引导孩子改正错误,做正确的事情.可当时孩子的父母就在孩子的身边,见小孩子对路人扔石子,竟然任之纵之.这就是父母的不对了.父母可是孩子的第一任老师,如果父母过会溺爱孩子,那么孩子就会失去正确的是非观念判断,辨别不明什么是社会的道德,时间一长,孩子做事就会很极端,轻则自已为是,重则就会走向犯罪的边缘.其实自己并没有危言耸听,孩子不会辩明是非,难道父母还不知道对与错?像这则故事中的父母,就是在纵容自己孩子在犯罪.
　　这个小青年踢晕小孩子后,孩子的父母不干了,于是孩子的兄长及父亲也参与进来.令人惋惜的是,孩子的父母并没有妥善地、正确地处理事情,而是以暴制暴.完全漠视法律于不顾.小孩子被打,父母去和小青年动手,非得把孩子的挨打找回来.这是什么逻辑,今天你把对方打了,明天对方也会打人再你你打一顿,冤冤相报何时了.而且这种报复的行为本就是一种错,如果双方伤了谁,都要受到法律上的追究.父母的报复行为,无形中又会影响小孩子对事情是非的判断,小孩子会认为自己被打,父母就要为自己报仇.孩子的这种观念一旦形成,那么以后遇到这种事情,就会以小时的判断为基准,以暴制暴,直至受到法律责任的追究.我想恐怕到时候,最后悔的莫过于孩子的父母吧.
　　综上所述,我始终认为,父母是孩子的第一任老师,孩子的儿时成长,完全受到父母的影响.父母的一言一行,都会影响到孩子,孩子善于模仿,孩子会学父母的言行和动作.作为父母,一定要给孩子创造良好的成长环境,一定要严格律己,给自己的孩子做出好的榜样.教会孩子正确地判断事物,引导孩子健康地成长.现在每个家庭一般都一个孩子,孩子的儿时教育是每一个父母应尽的责任,毕竟父母是孩子的第一任老师.为了孩子们的健康成长,作为父母中的一员,希望所有父母们都能树立正确的言行,给孩子作出他们为之骄傲的榜样.
by：0o扇o0